Each evaluation must be a minimum of 150 words or no credit. Evaluate the person

Each evaluation must be a minimum of 150 words or no credit.
Evaluate the persons arguments for each artwork. Do you agree with their views? Why or why not? Explain in detail.
Your response should be thoughtful, insightful, and substantive. It should show that you have thoroughly read the person post and carefully evaluated his or her arguments and positions.
You should critically evaluate the original poster’s statements and arguments and explain in detail whether or not you agree and why or why not. If you agree, don’t just say that you agree. Provide additional supporting information and/or examples to reinforce the original argument.
Your response must add new insights, information, observations and/or arguments to the discussion. You should not merely reiterate and/or agree with what has already been said, nor repeat facts, examples, or viewpoints that are already commonly known. Additional information may include additional facts, examples, images. Be sure to explain your additional information.

This entry was posted in Art & architecture. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.